David MacClement's interesting articles
« September 2010 »
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30
You are not logged in. Log in
Entries by Topic
All topics  «
news selected by DM
Blog Tools
Edit your Blog
Build a Blog
RSS Feed
View Profile
* item Titles (recent: top)
_ No Global Industry Is Profitable If Natural Capital Is Accounted For
_ I've visited-as-a-tourist or lived in 25 separate countries, on 46 occasions
_ Influence: mobile and more - WARC's James Aitchison
_ Message from Drought Crisis: Don't Put All Your Eggs in America's Breadbasket
_Is Sustainable Living Possible, When there are Too Many People for Too Few Jobs?
_ DM's 6 factors considered before any purchase
_ Interview with Tariq Ali, 20 Mar.2011
_ Ban Ki-moon: World's economic model is 'environmental suicide'
_ Do We Have Iran's Ahmadinejad All Wrong?
_ Lerner/Tikkun: an Israel/Palestine Peace Treaty; & State of the Spirit, 2011
_ George Monbiot predicts next 7 years, in Dec.2003; & California Models the World, LA-Times, in Jan.2004
_ Auckland Harbour Bridge Walk-cycle-way, NZ
_ Coal-Mine Rescue is not like Fire-fighting
_ Eyres, FT: Cultivate Growth Industry
_ Brayne: Drop in BBCs climate coverage
_ Renewables provide 73% of NZs total electricity
_ NZs Windflow 500kW Turbine: Success!
_ 150 earthquakes in Canterbury NZ
_ Christchurch NZ Earthquake News: RadioNZ
_ Toxic legacy: US Marines Fallujah assault
_ Suicides outnumber road deaths - NZ
_ Small Modular Nuclear Reactors? TOD
_ D & Bs Life in 32 Tweets, Ds Style
_ Totnes-UKs Energy Descent Action Plan
_ ShapeNZ Mining Survey in May 2010
_ Wake-UpCall: Worlds Bigges tOilJunkie; Nelder
_ Protests against new powers for NZ Govt agencies
_ Links for 14-Apr to 16-Apr 2010
_ URLs: furless animal found in Sichuan; Hominid Species Discovery Shows Transition Between Apes, Humans
_ Carbon-Free Britain planned by Center for Alternative Technology (CAT)
Friday, 17 September 2010
renewables 73% of NZ's total electricity
This was originally: http://www.med.govt.nz/templates/MultipageDocumentPage____44750.aspx#A1

renewable generation was 73 percent of New Zealand's total electricity
(electricity emissions drop to their lowest level since 2000)

The June-2010 quarter edition of the NZ Ministry of Economic Development's New Zealand Energy Quarterly is now available [1.3 MB PDF].

Key highlights this quarter include:

  • geothermal generation made up 13 percent of total electricity generation this quarter
  • renewable generation accounted for 73 percent of New Zealand's total electricity generation for the quarter
  • gas displaced coal for electricity generation
  • the highest level on record of sub-bituminous coal production was achieved
  • petrol demand decreased two percent and diesel demand decreased five percent, in line with normal seasonal variations
  • the high level of geothermal electricity generation and a preference for gas over coal in electricity generation saw electricity GHG emissions drop to their lowest level since 2000
  • the residential gas price has decreased six percent over six months due to a big price cut from Genesis.

Posted by davd at 20:10 NZD
Updated: Sunday, 19 September 2010 19:44 NZD
Post Comment | Permalink
Thursday, 16 September 2010
NZ's Windflow 500kW Turbine: Success

NZ's Windflow 500kW Turbine gets IEC class 1A certification!

Windflow Technology Ltd [WTL]'s main page: http://www.windflow.co.nz/
- has: "The engineering innovation of Windflow Technology Limited, (NZAX:WTL) offers wind farm developers a market-leading product for strong turbulent (IEC class 1A) wind conditions such as those experienced in New Zealand. ... The two-bladed, 500 kW Windflow-500|* [is] easy to transport, install and connect."

_|*: http://www.windflow.co.nz/products/windflow-technology-ltd-products
- has:

"_Cost-effective_:
Modern innovative design reduces turbine costs
Reduced transportation and construction costs
No need for expensive equipment to connect to the grid

_Durable and robust_:
Excellent performance in strong and turbulent winds
IEC class 1A certification (pending|` but see 'Achieved' below '_~_~_')
{International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) design standard:
IEC 61400-1 (edition 3)}

_Easy transport, installation and connection_:
Standard-size trucks and cranes
3-5 meter wide roads, no upgrades or infrastructure typically required
Two-bladed rotor and nacelle installed in one easy lift
Synchronous generation allows cost effective connection to the grid"


_WTL's "Information for shareholders and prospective investors" page_:
http://www.windflow.co.nz/investor-relations - links to their _latest_report_: http://snipurl.com/132nhl ; original:
http://www.windflow.co.nz/pdf-folder/Financial-Reporting/Preliminary%20Annual%20Report%20for%20year%20ended%2030%20June%202010.pdf
- published 13 September 2010, which contains:

_|`: IEC Certification (achieved on 15 Sept. press release below "_~_~_")

Apart from the pleasing performance of the turbines at TRH [Te Rere Hau windfarm, see just below], the highlight of the last financial year was receiving IEC design approval in May for the two main design innovations of the Windflow 500:
• the nacelle incorporating the patented Torque Limiting Gearbox and synchronous generator, and
• the two-bladed rotor, incorporating pitch-teeter coupling.
Having third party design verification of the heart of the turbine is a tribute to the extensive engineering work that has gone into the design.

Since balance date the Company has received its manufacturing evaluation conformity statement which testifies to the high quality standards of the Company’s sub-suppliers and the Windflow nacelle assembly processes.
The Company is now working with Lloyds Register to complete the remaining elements of Type Approval being the tower design approval and the overall Type Certificate.
Receiving the full IEC Type Certificate will facilitate the marketing of the Windflow 500 in New Zealand and internationally.


_Te Rere Hau wind farm_

This wind farm being developed with NZ Windfarms now has 65 turbines operating. The remaining 32 turbines are starting to be erected on the eastern extension site. Towers and blades are all at site and the nacelles that have been in storage for the last year will start being delivered to site once the electrical connection is livened. The 48.5 MW project is expected to be fully commissioned by the middle of 2011.

The performance of the turbines over the last year has been very pleasing. NZ Windfarms announced that: for the
• year ended 30 June 2010, the wind farm achieved 95.1% availability and in
• the three months to 30 June 2010 it performed at 96.2% availability.
Both of these measures exceed the contracted performance of the turbines.
NZ Windfarms and Windflow reached agreement in April over the outstanding issues relating to IEC certification and timeframes and payment terms for the batch of 32 turbines. The agreement also set out a process around future design improvements or upgrades and defined methods for dealing with these.

The company is working hard to ensure that any technical issues that arise are resolved in a timely manner in order to keep performance figures above warranted levels.
• As TRH is a world-class wind site, with strong winds and complex terrain, several technical issues have already been addressed over the past year. The company expects to address further issues from time to time over the next year, particularly as new turbines are being commissioned, and has adjusted its [Operation and Maintenance] O&M provisions to allow for these.

The TRH wind farm is proving to be an excellent reference wind farm site for the Windflow 500 and prospective customers who visit the site are generally impressed with the ease of installation, low environmental impact, and operational performance of the innovative turbines.

It is pleasing to be able to report the improved relationship which has developed between Windflow and NZ Windfarmshttp://www.nzx.com/markets/NZSX/NWF


_Long Gully_

One of the other major achievements in the last year was the Wellington City Council grant of resource consent for up to 25 Windflow 500 turbines at the Long Gully wind farm site. The two Environment Court appeals were resolved by June 2010 leaving a clear consent.

Windflow led the consenting effort on behalf of Mighty River Power who initiated the project.
The fact that the local community generally supported the modest-sized wind farm and that the consent was granted in a timely manner is a tribute to the distributed generation philosophy and the team involved.

Due to a change in Mighty River Power’s generation portfolio strategy which has seen them divesting small scale generation, Mighty River Power notified Windflow in June that it would not proceed to construction stage as expected.

Windflow has since been in negotiations with Mighty River Power to transfer the project to Windflow so that the Company can work towards other avenues which would see the project built and contributing towards the country’s renewable energy target. If these negotiations are successful, Windflow will announce further plans for the project.


_International markets_

With the turbines pleasing track record at TRH, the Company’s production and quality systems well established and the essential elements of IEC certification in place, Windflow has increasingly been progressing opportunities in international markets.

United Kingdom
The most exciting of these opportunities is in the United Kingdom (UK) where policies incentivising small scale renewable generation came into place on 1 April and resulted in an unprecedented demand for 500 kW wind turbines. Windflow staff have been responding to enquiries since the end of 2009 when the Feed In Tariffs were signalled.
Market visits in May and June confirmed the sizeable opportunity and resulted in identification of several potential partners for a timely market entry.
The company entered into a Heads of Agreement with a preferred distributor in June and concluded the agreement in August, announcing Ventus Green Energy from Scotland as Windflow’s exclusive distributor in the UK.

The level of these incentives provide a compelling investment opportunity for customers in the UK.
Accordingly Windflow, as one of the few 500 kW turbine providers in the world, is now well placed to make significant sales in this market and will be working alongside its distributor to progress potential orders. Once initial orders are achieved, which will depend among other things on Windflow’s ability to obtain performance bonds and other such financial arrangements as are normally required for export business, the Company anticipates rapid growth of orders in the short term. Accordingly the Company is working closely with its bankers, NZ Trade and Enterprise and the NZ Export Credit Office in this effort.

Chile
Windflow is continuing to work with its agent, Seawind South America, to promote the Windflow 500 in Chile.
CEO/Director Geoff Henderson visited Chile in June to meet with prospective customers from the mining and energy industry and to assess sites.

The New Zealand government is supporting environmental co-operation between Chile and New Zealand and a meeting was requested with Windflow when the Chilean Energy Minister visited Wellington in late June.
The Chilean Energy Minister has since met with Seawind in Chile and Windflow is hopeful of future developments in this market.

USA
The USA has been a target market for Windflow for many years, and with the first production run of the 50 Hz turbine successfully completed, attention is turning to _development_of_ the _60_Hz_version_ for the North American market. This market has grown significantly in the last year, with US policies around renewable energy seeing large investment in projects and local manufacturing capability.
New Zealand Trade and Enterprise hosted a networking reception in Dallas in May during the American Wind Energy Association conference on behalf of four NZ companies attending the conference, including Windflow. Over 60 potential suppliers, customers and partners attended the evening and learned about New Zealand’s clean technology offerings.

In preparation for Windflow’s planned US market entry, Windflow staff have worked towards securing potential demonstration sites for Windflow turbines in the high wind regions of southern California, and met with potential O&M-partners and customers. There has also been progress in developing relationships with potential investment partners.
...


_Outlook_

Overall, Windflow has many positive accomplishments and should have a great future, poised as it is to participate in the largest 21st century growth sector of the electricity industry. $90 billion worth of wind turbines were installed in 2009 world-wide. In order to access a share of this market, Windflow has established and is seeking to grow a knowledge-based industry _in_New Zealand’s_unsubsidised_economy_.
The company has unique intellectual property around its light-weight yet robust design. This provides a fundamental manufacturing cost advantage, which will come into its own with sustained quantity production. This underpins Windflow’s confidence that it will now achieve significant ongoing sales based on the turbine’s merits as evidenced by its track record at TRH and the IEC certification. As usual there is no shortage of challenges for Windflow. 2009 was a tough year for Windflow, as it was for most of the global wind industry. Turbine orders fell generally in 2009, there is now an oversupply of turbines world-wide and prices have fallen as a result. The volatility of the New Zealand dollar affects Windflow’s competitiveness with international suppliers from month to month.
In New Zealand, electricity demand growth has been weak, the hydro lakes are full and the spot market for wholesale electricity is not providing encouraging signals for new generation here.
The NZ Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) took effect in July but its value as an incentive for renewable energy appears very small (less than 1 ¢/kWh) especially after it was reduced by legislative changes last year.

All of these challenges, along with last year’s difficult dispute with NZ Windfarms, have contributed to the fact that the Company has been delayed in its market development plans. A production gap in the first half of calendar 2011 is now inevitable due to the lead times between orders and key nacelle assembly components being available. The directors and management are working to minimise production disruption pending the receipt of ongoing orders. As a result further losses are expected in the year ending 30 June 2011.

With so much world-class technical development completed and a convincing track record in place, the Company remains committed to the fundamental rationale for developing the Class 1A Windflow turbine for New Zealand’s challenging wind environment and similar niches within the large international market. The Company is focusing on securing future orders, both in New Zealand and overseas, and is attracting strong interest in the fact that the turbines are proving themselves on the Manawatu Saddle. Exciting and challenging times are ahead for the Company as it aims to achieve further sales and move into export markets. The Company is working closely with its bankers, NZ Trade and Enterprise and the NZ Export Credit Office in this effort.

Windflow is now preparing for new capital raisings to finance its plans for the next phase of development both in NZ and overseas. The directors have already commenced work on preparation of an offer document and will be communicating more about this in due course.

The contribution that Windflow makes to the knowledge economy and job creation in New Zealand is something that all stakeholders (staff, suppliers and shareholders included), should be proud of. What the Company has achieved to date, despite setbacks along the way, should not be underestimated. The directors would like to acknowledge the support of all the Company’s stakeholders and thank them for being part of the journey thus far.


{Footnote: One estimate of the electric production at the TRH windfarm is at: http://cli.gs/6TaAzg (that is:https://davd.tripod.com/#new1 )}

_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_
_|`: MEDIA RELEASE:

http://www.windflow.co.nz/news/media-releases/2010/windflow-marks-major-engineering-achievement
- 15 September 2010, is:

Windflow marks Major Engineering Achievement

Windflow Technology has _achieved_ a major engineering success with the news today that Lloyd’s Register has awarded its Type Approval Certificate to the Windflow 500 turbine. This confirms that the turbine meets Class 1A of the latest International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) design standard IEC 61400-1 (edition 3).

Class 1A certification attests that the Windflow 500 will operate for more than 20 years in the strongest, most turbulent wind regime in the IEC classification.

The Company reports that certification has required years of engineering horsepower and has set a new standard in wind turbine excellence in the medium size 500 kW category.

It gives interested parties and purchasers of the Windflow 500 turbine confidence that the turbine has been rigorously tested to operate in the highest strength winds. During the IEC process 2,800 pages of engineering calculations were scrutinised by Lloyd’s Register along with more than 200 drawings and 37 specifications; the prototype turbine at Gebbies Pass (near Christchurch) was put through a regime of safety and mechanical load tests, as well as measuring its acoustics and power output. The blade was tested for its ultimate strength by the University of Canterbury and for its fatigue life at the IRL test hall in Auckland.

According to Chief Executive Officer Geoff Henderson the confirmation of IEC certification is the end of an engineering marathon and a strong kick-start to the international marketing drive that recently gained critical momentum through a policy change in the UK. The company has assembled a team of 20 professional engineers in its Christchurch headquarters supported by the company’s commercial team, the skilled tradespeople in its nacelle assembly and blade factories, and the windsmiths in Palmerston North servicing its 66 operating turbines. The company, which is the only utility-scale wind turbine manufacturer in Australasia, currently employs more than 50 people directly and about 400 indirectly throughout New Zealand.

“We are immensely proud of our team’s work and despite challenges along the way we always believed that our innovative Windflow 500 would speak for itself and affirm the confidence of our shareholders,” said Mr Henderson. “Windflow Technology and the Windflow 500 have set a new wind energy benchmark and one that our supporters can feel very excited about. The turbine is designed for New Zealand’s lean and mean economic environment as well as our turbulent high wind sites. Its fundamental economic advantage is that it uses fewer tonnes of materials (typically 50%) for the same output as competing 3-bladers (large or mid-size). The class 1A IEC Type Approval validates this lighter, smarter approach to operating at high wind sites.”

Wind turbine certification is an independent determination that provides assurance of a turbine performing for a minimum of 20 years in a specified environment. Because the IEC certification standard prescribes required safety margins for all engineering calculations, compliance provides the statistical backup sought by those who finance and insure wind farms.

Currently 66 Windflow 500 turbines are installed in New Zealand. A full-scale prototype has been operating since 2003 at Gebbies Pass near Christchurch. Five began operation at the Te Rere Hau wind farm on the outskirts of Palmerston North in 2006 with another 60 being installed at Te Rere Hau between November 2008 and October 2009. In addition 32 turbines are in production and are planned to be installed at Te Rere Hau by mid-2011.

Background

Windflow Technology was built around the pioneering engineering efforts of Geoff Henderson and his team as they determinedly designed, built and marketed the breakthrough two-blade wind turbine with innovative design features including a 33 metre diameter teetering rotor, a torque-limiting gearbox and a 30 metre tall tower.

A pre-requisite to the IEC certification was ISO 9001 certification which Windflow Technology achieved in June 2008.

IEC Milestones

ISO 9001                                             June 2008

Design approval

            Nacelle                                    May 2010

            Rotor assembly                     May 2010

            Tower                                       September 2010

Type testing                                        August 2010

Manufacturing evaluation                August 2010

Type Approval                                    September 2010

 

Windflow Technology: Business Milestones

  • September 2001: Initial public offering raises $2.6 million. This provides the funds to commence developing the prototype and seek a Resource Consent for the first site at Gebbies Pass on Banks Peninsula, near Christchurch.
  • July 2003: Installation and start up of the prototype turbine at Gebbies Pass.
  • September 2003: A 1 for 2 Rights Issue raises just under $5 million. This provides funds to continue development of the turbine and the Te Rere Hau wind farm site.
  • November 2003: Windflow Technology is one of “the first fifteen” companies listed on the NZAX market when it opens.
  • December 2003: Granting of 519,000 tonnes of carbon credits to NZ Windfarms, then a wholly owned subsidiary of Windflow Technology, for the development of the Te Rere Hau wind farm near Palmerston North.
  • February 2005: Granting of a Resource Consent to NZ Windfarms to develop the 97 turbine Te Rere Hau wind farm.
  • June 2005: Windflow Technology raises $3.3 million by way of a further Rights issue.
  • December 2005: An initial public offering by NZ Windfarms raises $4 million followed by listing on the NZAX. Windflow Technology’s stake is accordingly reduced from full ownership to a 43% shareholding.
  • August 2006: A consortium of Babcock & Brown and NP Power enter into a 50-50 joint venture arrangement with NZ Windfarms for the development of Te Rere Hau wind farm plus possible other sites.
  • September 2006: Installation and start up of the first five turbines (of 97 in total) on the Te Rere Hau wind farm. The farm is opened by the Prime Minister, Rt. Hon. Helen Clark.
  • October 2006: Exercise of options by NZ Windfarms shareholders raises a further $4 million, diluting Windflow Technology’s shareholding in NZ Windfarms to 27%.
  • May 2007: A subsequent public offering by NZ Windfarms raises $75 million including Vector Limited taking a cornerstone stake of 19.9%. Windflow Technology’s shareholding in NZ Windfarms dilutes to 3%.
  • September 2007: Windflow Technology establishes its own nacelle assembly factory in Riccarton, Christchurch and moves to adjoining offices.
  • January 2007 - October 2008: The Te Rere Hau joint venture orders further 92 Windflow 500 turbines to be installed at Te Rere Hau.
  • October 2007: Windflow Technology wins the Sustainable Business Network’s Sustainable Design and Innovation Award and the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Authority’s Product Innovation Award for its Windflow 500 turbine.
  • November 2007: Windflow Technology raises $5 million in a fully-subscribed Rights issue.
  • December 2007: Windflow Technology acquires remaining 50% of Wind Blades Ltd (its blade manufacturing operation in Pakuranga, Auckland).
  • April 2008: Windflow Technology staff numbers 50, a major increase from 15 in April 2007.
  • June 2008: Windflow Technology forms a Joint Venture with AH Gears (its gearbox manufacturer in Auckland), called Wind Gears Ltd.
  • June 2008: Windflow Technology gains ISO 9001 certification.
  • June/October 2008: The company announced on 30 June 2008 an agreement with State Owned Enterprise electricity generator and retailer Mighty River Power under which Windflow Technology will construct a wind farm (Long Gully) for Mighty River Power using Windflow 500 turbines. State Owned Enterprise electricity generator and retailer Mighty River Power buys a 19.95% cornerstone shareholding in Windflow Technology.
  • September/October 2008: Windflow Technology raised $10.3 million through the September options exercise, private placements, and the Mighty River Power share purchase.
  • November 2009: 65 turbines operating at Te Rere Hau wind farm.
  • March 2010: NZ Windfarms receives consent for an additional 56 Windflow 500 turbines at Te Rere Hau wind farm on an eastern extension.
  • May 2010: NZ Windfarms raises $31.4 million to complete Te Rere Hau wind farm.
  • June 2010: Long Gully wind farm south-west of Wellington receives consent for 25 Windflow 500 turbines, clear of appeals.
  • August 2010: Windflow Technology signs UK Distributor Agreement with Ventus Green Energy to maximise the wind energy opportunities for 500 kW turbines under the UK government’s feed-in tariff scheme.
  • September 2010: Windflow 500 receives IEC Type Approval Certificate from Lloyd’s Register.

 

For further information please contact:
Mr Geoff Henderson, Chief Executive Officer and Director, tel: 03 365 8960

Posted by davd at 12:55 NZD
Updated: Friday, 17 September 2010 16:04 NZD
Post Comment | Permalink
Wednesday, 8 September 2010
150 earthquakes in Canterbury NZ

-{See The NZ Herald's "Christchurch services: What's working, what's not
2:28 PM Wednesday Sep 8, 2010

It's subhead is: Find out which Christchurch services are working and which are not, following Satuday's 7.1 magnitude quake and this morning's violent 5.1 aftershock.

(Also: Visit the Canterbury Earthquake website for updates )}-

The rest of this is David MacClement's compilation of:
150 earthquakes in Canterbury New Zealand, to: Wednesday, 8/09/2010 2:49 pm NZST. Data from:
GNS SCIENCE
GeoNet Data Centre
Lower Hutt, New Zealand.
Geonet.org.nz
Num.Universal
Time
NZ Standard
Time
Reference
number
S-LatitE-LongitLocationFocal
depth, km
Richter
magnit.
  Web page
103/09/10 16:35Saturday, 4/09/2010 4:35 am3366146/G43.55172.1840 km west of Christchurch107.1http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3366146g.html
203/09/10 16:56Saturday, 4/09/2010 4:56 am3366155/G43.56172.2330 km west of Christchurch85.3http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3366155g.html
303/09/10 17:06Saturday, 4/09/2010 5:06 am3366157/G43.49172.3230 km west of Christchurch154.8http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3366157g.html
403/09/10 17:26Saturday, 4/09/2010 5:26 am3366167/G43.54172.2330 km west of Christchurch54.9http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3366167g.html
503/09/10 17:26Saturday, 4/09/2010 5:26 am3366166/G43.6172.2530 km west of Christchurch54.8http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3366166g.html
603/09/10 17:46Saturday, 4/09/2010 5:46 am3366177/G43.6172.2330 km west of Christchurch204.3http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3366177g.html
703/09/10 17:55Saturday, 4/09/2010 5:55 am3366182/G43.5172.2530 km west of Christchurch54.6http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3366182g.html
803/09/10 18:01Saturday, 4/09/2010 6:01 am3366184/G43.63172.3130 km west of Christchurch114.6http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3366184g.html
903/09/10 18:04Saturday, 4/09/2010 6:04 am3366187/G43.58172.6610 km south of Christchurch603.9http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3366187g.html
1003/09/10 18:23Saturday, 4/09/2010 6:23 am3366196/G43.6172.1210 km south of Darfield54.3http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3366196g.html
1103/09/10 18:33Saturday, 4/09/2010 6:33 am3366198/G43.79172.5730 km south of Christchurch54.3http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3366198g.html
1203/09/10 19:07Saturday, 4/09/2010 7:07 am3366213/G43.56172.2530 km west of Christchurch254.7http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3366213g.html
1303/09/10 19:13Saturday, 4/09/2010 7:13 am3366215/G43.7172.5720 km south of Christchurch94.6http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3366215g.html
1403/09/10 19:52Saturday, 4/09/2010 7:52 am3366227/G43.53172.1310 km south of Darfield54.0http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3366227g.html
1503/09/10 19:56Saturday, 4/09/2010 7:56 am3366230/G43.55172.3720 km west of Christchurch75.2http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3366230g.html
1603/09/10 22:17Saturday, 4/09/2010 10:17 am3366288/G43.64172.2930 km south-west of Christchurch54.4http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3366288g.html
1703/09/10 22:58Saturday, 4/09/2010 10:58 am3366305/G43.6172.3520 km west of Christchurch53.9http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3366305g.html
1803/09/10 23:12Saturday, 4/09/2010 11:12 am3366310/G43.53172.2710 km east of Darfield125.3http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3366310g.html
1904/09/10 00:18Saturday, 4/09/2010 12:18 pm3366340/G43.46172.2210 km east of Darfield124.0http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3366340g.html
2004/09/10 01:49Saturday, 4/09/2010 1:49 pm3366375/G43.57172.3520 km west of Christchurch204.0http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3366375g.html
2104/09/10 04:33Saturday, 4/09/2010 4:33 pm3366445/G43.59172.0510 km south-west of Darfield23.9http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3366445g.html
2204/09/10 04:48Saturday, 4/09/2010 4:48 pm3366450/G43.66172.4920 km south-west of Christchurch154.3http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3366450g.html
2304/09/10 04:55Saturday, 4/09/2010 4:55 pm3366452/G43.54171.9710 km south-west of Darfield105.4http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3366452g.html
2404/09/10 05:07Saturday, 4/09/2010 5:07 pm3366457/G43.49172.4120 km west of Christchurch103.7http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3366457g.html
2504/09/10 06:35Saturday, 4/09/2010 6:35 pm3366490/G43.65172.2320 km south-east of Darfield53.8http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3366490g.html
2604/09/10 06:38Saturday, 4/09/2010 6:38 pm3366492/G43.66172.2720 km south-east of Darfield123.8http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3366492g.html
2704/09/10 06:54Saturday, 4/09/2010 6:54 pm3366499/G43.61172.510 km south-west of Christchurch124.3http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3366499g.html
2804/09/10 07:03Saturday, 4/09/2010 7:03 pm3366503/G43.56172.4810 km west of Christchurch204.6http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3366503g.html
2904/09/10 08:46Saturday, 4/09/2010 8:46 pm3366542/G43.69172.3130 km south-east of Darfield53.9http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3366542g.html
3004/09/10 08:54Saturday, 4/09/2010 8:54 pm3366544/G43.56171.920 km south-west of Darfield154.6http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3366544g.html
3104/09/10 10:34Saturday, 4/09/2010 10:34 pm3366585/G43.61172.4630 km south-east of Darfield204.5http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3366585g.html
3204/09/10 10:38Saturday, 4/09/2010 10:38 pm3366586/G43.25171.9710 km north of Springfield45.0http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3366586g.html
3304/09/10 10:38Saturday, 4/09/2010 10:38 pm3366593/G43.26171.9930 km north-west of Darfield84.9http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3366593g.html
3404/09/10 11:27Saturday, 4/09/2010 11:27 pm3366609/G43.57172.4130 km east of Darfield203.8http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3366609g.html
3504/09/10 11:43Saturday, 4/09/2010 11:43 pm3366615/G43.57171.8720 km south-west of Darfield104.1http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3366615g.html
3604/09/10 12:10Sunday, 5/09/2010 12:10 am3366624/G43.57172.320 km south-east of Darfield63.8http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3366624g.html
3704/09/10 12:57Sunday, 5/09/2010 12:57 am3366644/G43.48172.14Within 5 km of Darfield83.8http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3366644g.html
3804/09/10 13:47Sunday, 5/09/2010 1:47 am3366664/G43.65172.3720 km south-west of Christchurch123.8http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3366664g.html
3904/09/10 13:58Sunday, 5/09/2010 1:58 am3366669/G43.51172.210 km east of Darfield63.2http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3366669g.html
4004/09/10 14:35Sunday, 5/09/2010 2:35 am3366683/G43.49172.1810 km east of Darfield73.4http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3366683g.html
4104/09/10 14:42Sunday, 5/09/2010 2:42 am3366686/G43.67172.4330 km south-east of Darfield53.9http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3366686g.html
4204/09/10 16:08Sunday, 5/09/2010 4:08 am3366721/G43.62172.4430 km south-east of Darfield154.0http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3366721g.html
4304/09/10 16:23Sunday, 5/09/2010 4:23 am3366726/G43.56172.0710 km south-west of Darfield54.4http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3366726g.html
4404/09/10 16:31Sunday, 5/09/2010 4:31 am3366729/G43.55172.420 km east of Darfield73.8http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3366729g.html
4504/09/10 17:17Sunday, 5/09/2010 5:17 am3366750/G43.63172.1520 km south of Darfield54.6http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3366750g.html
4604/09/10 17:20Sunday, 5/09/2010 5:20 am3366751/G43.59172.1710 km south of Darfield95.1http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3366751g.html
4704/09/10 17:28Sunday, 5/09/2010 5:28 am3366754/G43.6172.1910 km south-east of Darfield154.1http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3366754g.html
4804/09/10 17:53Sunday, 5/09/2010 5:53 am3366765/G43.63172.1720 km south of Darfield154.5http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3366765g.html
4904/09/10 18:59Sunday, 5/09/2010 6:59 am3366794/G43.65172.2420 km south-east of Darfield54.5http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3366794g.html
5004/09/10 19:11Sunday, 5/09/2010 7:11 am3366799/G43.65172.4830 km south-east of Darfield153.7http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3366799g.html
5104/09/10 19:30Sunday, 5/09/2010 7:30 am3366806/G43.58171.9620 km south-west of Darfield53.7http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3366806g.html
5204/09/10 19:41Sunday, 5/09/2010 7:41 am3366810/G43.61172.2720 km south-east of Darfield54.2http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3366810g.html
5304/09/10 19:51Sunday, 5/09/2010 7:51 am3366813/G43.5171.9320 km west of Darfield154.2http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3366813g.html
5404/09/10 20:13Sunday, 5/09/2010 8:13 am3366821/G43.67172.5120 km south-west of Christchurch204.1http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3366821g.html
5504/09/10 21:46Sunday, 5/09/2010 9:46 am3366858/G43.57172.4120 km west of Christchurch84.5http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3366858g.html
5604/09/10 21:49Sunday, 5/09/2010 9:49 am3366860/G43.62172.2720 km south-east of Darfield123.8http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3366860g.html
5704/09/10 22:03Sunday, 5/09/2010 10:03 am3366865/G43.63172.4720 km south-west of Christchurch74.1http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3366865g.html
5804/09/10 22:15Sunday, 5/09/2010 10:15 am3366870/G43.61172.4420 km south-west of Christchurch154.3http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3366870g.html
5904/09/10 22:23Sunday, 5/09/2010 10:23 am3366873/G43.28171.9710 km north-east of Springfield73.5http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3366873g.html
6005/09/10 00:19Sunday, 5/09/2010 12:19 pm3366916/G43.61172.3720 km south-west of Christchurch124.3http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3366916g.html
6105/09/10 00:27Sunday, 5/09/2010 12:27 pm3366920/G43.59172.0210 km south-west of Darfield53.9http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3366920g.html
6205/09/10 00:43Sunday, 5/09/2010 12:43 pm3366925/G43.65172.4720 km south-west of Christchurch124.3http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3366925g.html
6305/09/10 01:04Sunday, 5/09/2010 1:04 pm3366933/G43.68172.5120 km south-west of Lyttelton125.0http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3366933g.html
6405/09/10 01:55Sunday, 5/09/2010 1:55 pm3366951/G43.53172.2410 km south-east of Darfield124.3http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3366951g.html
6505/09/10 02:34Sunday, 5/09/2010 2:34 pm3366965/G43.61172.3920 km north of Leeston123.4http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3366965g.html
6605/09/10 02:53Sunday, 5/09/2010 2:53 pm3366973/G43.65172.5510 km south-west of Christchurch153.8http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3366973g.html
6705/09/10 05:15Sunday, 5/09/2010 5:15 pm3367026/G43.59172.4620 km south-west of Christchurch123.2http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3367026g.html
6805/09/10 07:10Sunday, 5/09/2010 7:10 pm3367071/G43.27172.0210 km north-east of Springfield83.2http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3367071g.html
6905/09/10 09:07Sunday, 5/09/2010 9:07 pm3367116/G43.57172.320 km south-east of Darfield94.1http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3367116g.html
7005/09/10 09:44Sunday, 5/09/2010 9:44 pm3367131/G43.53172.4220 km west of Christchurch23.5http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3367131g.html
7105/09/10 10:18Sunday, 5/09/2010 10:18 pm3367147/G43.63172.2620 km south-east of Darfield53.5http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3367147g.html
7205/09/10 10:55Sunday, 5/09/2010 10:55 pm3367159/G43.58172.4910 km south-west of Christchurch153.5http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3367159g.html
7305/09/10 12:16Monday, 6/09/2010 12:16 am3367190/G43.62172.4910 km south-west of Christchurch74.3http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3367190g.html
7405/09/10 12:52Monday, 6/09/2010 12:52 am3367202/G43.44172.2110 km north-east of Darfield153.9http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3367202g.html
7505/09/10 12:52Monday, 6/09/2010 12:52 am3367203/G43.48172.2110 km east of Darfield53.5http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3367203g.html
7605/09/10 16:06Monday, 6/09/2010 4:06 am3367278/G43.59171.9110 km south of Coalgate104.8http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3367278g.html
7705/09/10 16:10Monday, 6/09/2010 4:10 am3367280/G43.53172.3420 km east of Darfield104.0http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3367280g.html
7805/09/10 17:07Monday, 6/09/2010 5:07 am3367302/G43.61172.3820 km north of Leeston53.6http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3367302g.html
7905/09/10 17:18Monday, 6/09/2010 5:18 am3367305/G43.62172.510 km south-west of Christchurch154.2http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3367305g.html
8005/09/10 17:42Monday, 6/09/2010 5:42 am3367316/G43.6172.1110 km south of Darfield53.6http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3367316g.html
8105/09/10 19:18Monday, 6/09/2010 7:18 am3367355/G43.63172.4620 km south-west of Christchurch53.8http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3367355g.html
8205/09/10 21:31Monday, 6/09/2010 9:31 am3367407/G43.62172.420 km south-west of Christchurch53.6http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3367407g.html
8305/09/10 21:46Monday, 6/09/2010 9:46 am3367413/G43.59172.4220 km west of Christchurch53.5http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3367413g.html
8406/09/10 00:18Monday, 6/09/2010 12:18 pm3367470/G43.58172.2920 km south-east of Darfield153.5http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3367470g.html
8506/09/10 00:35Monday, 6/09/2010 12:35 pm3367476/G43.58172.2920 km south-east of Darfield204.5http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3367476g.html
8606/09/10 02:06Monday, 6/09/2010 2:06 pm3367512/G43.67172.520 km south-west of Christchurch123.7http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3367512g.html
8706/09/10 02:48Monday, 6/09/2010 2:48 pm3367527/G43.67172.4320 km south-west of Christchurch64.1http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3367527g.html
8806/09/10 03:07Monday, 6/09/2010 3:07 pm3367535/G43.59172.3820 km west of Christchurch84.4http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3367535g.html
8906/09/10 03:34Monday, 6/09/2010 3:34 pm3367543/G43.47172.17Within 5 km of Darfield74.2http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3367543g.html
9006/09/10 03:54Monday, 6/09/2010 3:54 pm3367552/G43.59172.4620 km west of Christchurch203.7http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3367552g.html
9106/09/10 04:31Monday, 6/09/2010 4:31 pm3367565/G43.49172.15Within 5 km of Darfield83.0http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3367565g.html
9206/09/10 06:01Monday, 6/09/2010 6:01 pm3367608/G43.62172.3320 km south-east of Darfield44.4http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3367608g.html
9306/09/10 06:13Monday, 6/09/2010 6:13 pm3367612/G43.64172.5310 km south-west of Christchurch53.7http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3367612g.html
9406/09/10 06:19Monday, 6/09/2010 6:19 pm3367613/G43.62172.3120 km south-east of Darfield63.8http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3367613g.html
9506/09/10 07:03Monday, 6/09/2010 7:03 pm3367629/G43.45172.1910 km north-east of Darfield63.7http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3367629g.html
9606/09/10 07:28Monday, 6/09/2010 7:28 pm3367638/G43.51172.210 km east of Darfield73.8http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3367638g.html
9706/09/10 09:20Monday, 6/09/2010 9:20 pm3367681/G43.61172.3720 km south-east of Darfield93.5http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3367681g.html
9806/09/10 10:21Monday, 6/09/2010 10:21 pm3367703/G43.66172.4720 km south-west of Christchurch103.6http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3367703g.html
9906/09/10 11:14Monday, 6/09/2010 11:14 pm3367740/G43.64172.5210 km south-west of Christchurch53.7http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3367740g.html
10006/09/10 11:24Monday, 6/09/2010 11:24 pm3367742/G43.57172.3920 km south-east of Darfield95.2http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3367742g.html
10106/09/10 11:38Monday, 6/09/2010 11:38 pm3367748/G43.57172.4220 km west of Christchurch154.0http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3367748g.html
10206/09/10 11:40Monday, 6/09/2010 11:40 pm3367749/G43.59171.8920 km south-west of Darfield95.4http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3367749g.html
10306/09/10 11:47Monday, 6/09/2010 11:47 pm3367750/G43.61172.4730 km south-east of Darfield153.7http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3367750g.html
10406/09/10 11:54Monday, 6/09/2010 11:54 pm3367753/G43.64172.4830 km south-east of Darfield54.2http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3367753g.html
10506/09/10 12:21Tuesday, 7/09/2010 12:21 am3367765/G43.54171.9220 km south-west of Darfield154.7http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3367765g.html
10606/09/10 12:47Tuesday, 7/09/2010 12:47 am3367774/G43.65172.5310 km south-west of Christchurch153.5http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3367774g.html
10706/09/10 12:51Tuesday, 7/09/2010 12:51 am3367776/G43.57172.3620 km south-east of Darfield53.9http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3367776g.html
10806/09/10 13:39Tuesday, 7/09/2010 1:39 am3367795/G43.62172.4930 km south-east of Darfield53.4http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3367795g.html
10906/09/10 14:52Tuesday, 7/09/2010 2:52 am3367822/G43.56172.4230 km east of Darfield103.1http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3367822g.html
11006/09/10 15:14Tuesday, 7/09/2010 3:14 am3367830/G43.43172.1710 km north-east of Darfield93.7http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3367830g.html
11106/09/10 15:24Tuesday, 7/09/2010 3:24 am3367832/G43.65172.2420 km south-east of Darfield155.4http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3367832g.html
11206/09/10 16:17Tuesday, 7/09/2010 4:17 am3367853/G43.6172.4910 km south-west of Christchurch73.5http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3367853g.html
11306/09/10 17:14Tuesday, 7/09/2010 5:14 am3367872/G43.48172.16Within 5 km of Darfield153.9http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3367872g.html
11406/09/10 17:17Tuesday, 7/09/2010 5:17 am3367873/G43.42172.1410 km north of Darfield53.3http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3367873g.html
11506/09/10 18:22Tuesday, 7/09/2010 6:22 am3367897/G43.59172.2720 km south-east of Darfield153.5http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3367897g.html
11606/09/10 20:14Tuesday, 7/09/2010 8:14 am3367937/G43.64172.3930 km south-east of Darfield53.6http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3367937g.html
11706/09/10 20:24Tuesday, 7/09/2010 8:24 am3367940/G43.65172.4630 km south-east of Darfield53.4http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3367940g.html
11806/09/10 22:03Tuesday, 7/09/2010 10:03 am3367973/G39.96176.9330 km east of Waipawa403.6http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3367973g.html
11906/09/10 22:11Tuesday, 7/09/2010 10:11 am3367976/G43.47172.17Within 5 km of Darfield53.1http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3367976g.html
12006/09/10 22:48Tuesday, 7/09/2010 10:48 am3367989/G40.44176.820 km south-east of Porangahau155.2http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3367989g.html
12106/09/10 23:36Tuesday, 7/09/2010 11:36 am3368008/G43.6117220 km south-west of Darfield123.9http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3368008g.html
12207/09/10 01:04Tuesday, 7/09/2010 1:04 pm3368039/G43.66172.540 km south-east of Darfield203.1http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3368039g.html
12307/09/10 01:07Tuesday, 7/09/2010 1:07 pm3368040/G43.59172.4330 km south-east of Darfield53.5http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3368040g.html
12407/09/10 03:04Tuesday, 7/09/2010 3:04 pm3368083/G43.58172.2820 km south-east of Darfield73.3http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3368083g.html
12507/09/10 03:48Tuesday, 7/09/2010 3:48 pm3368099/G41.35174.5420 km west of Wellington404.0http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3368099g.html
12607/09/10 04:18Tuesday, 7/09/2010 4:18 pm3368110/G41.36174.5420 km south-west of Wellington403.8http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3368110g.html
12707/09/10 04:56Tuesday, 7/09/2010 4:56 pm3368123/G43.55172.320 km south-east of Darfield33.1http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3368123g.html
12807/09/10 06:04Tuesday, 7/09/2010 6:04 pm3368148/G43.55172.420 km east of Darfield53.2http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3368148g.html
12907/09/10 06:36Tuesday, 7/09/2010 6:36 pm3368159/G40.43176.7920 km south-east of Porangahau124.2http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3368159g.html
13007/09/10 06:40Tuesday, 7/09/2010 6:40 pm3368160/G43.59171.7430 km west of Darfield53.8http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3368160g.html
13107/09/10 07:44Tuesday, 7/09/2010 7:44 pm3368182/G43.56172.420 km east of Darfield83.2http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3368182g.html
13207/09/10 08:08Tuesday, 7/09/2010 8:08 pm3368191/G43.43172.1610 km north-east of Darfield53.4http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3368191g.html
13307/09/10 08:28Tuesday, 7/09/2010 8:28 pm3368198/G43.45172.1910 km north-east of Darfield53.5http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3368198g.html
13407/09/10 08:52Tuesday, 7/09/2010 8:52 pm3368207/G43.6172.1710 km south of Darfield73.9http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3368207g.html
13507/09/10 09:07Tuesday, 7/09/2010 9:07 pm3368217/G43.58172.3920 km south-east of Darfield153.8http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3368217g.html
13607/09/10 09:08Tuesday, 7/09/2010 9:08 pm3368211/G43.55172.530 km east of Darfield203.9http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3368211g.html
13707/09/10 11:06Tuesday, 7/09/2010 11:06 pm3368251/G43.65172.4630 km south-east of Darfield73.6http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3368251g.html
13807/09/10 12:41Wednesday, 8/09/2010 12:41 am3368287/G43.59172.4230 km south-east of Darfield124.6http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3368287g.html
13907/09/10 15:47Wednesday, 8/09/2010 3:47 am3368356/G43.57172.4330 km east of Darfield153.7http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3368356g.html
14007/09/10 15:59Wednesday, 8/09/2010 3:59 am3368361/G43.51172.16Within 5 km of Darfield94.5http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3368361g.html
14107/09/10 18:09Wednesday, 8/09/2010 6:09 am3368409/G43.61172.3220 km south-east of Darfield83.7http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3368409g.html
14207/09/10 18:22Wednesday, 8/09/2010 6:22 am3368414/G43.54172.3220 km east of Darfield153.5http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3368414g.html
14307/09/10 19:42Wednesday, 8/09/2010 7:42 am3368443/G43.59172.3920 km south-east of Darfield54.1http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3368443g.html
14407/09/10 19:49Wednesday, 8/09/2010 7:49 am3368445/G43.58172.6910 km south-east of Christchurch65.1http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3368445g.html
14507/09/10 20:15Wednesday, 8/09/2010 8:15 am3368453/G43.58172.69Within 5 km of Lyttelton53.8http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3368453g.html
14607/09/10 21:01Wednesday, 8/09/2010 9:01 am3368471/G43.56172.420 km east of Darfield94.4http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3368471g.html
14707/09/10 21:37Wednesday, 8/09/2010 9:37 am3368485/G43.62172.3420 km south-east of Darfield153.5http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3368485g.html
14807/09/10 21:39Wednesday, 8/09/2010 9:39 am3368486/G43.62172.710 km south-east of Christchurch84.0http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3368486g.html
14908/09/10 01:41Wednesday, 8/09/2010 1:41 pm3368577/G43.59171.8820 km south-west of Darfield54.1http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3368577g.html
15008/09/10 02:49Wednesday, 8/09/2010 2:49 pm3368607/G43.62172.3730 km south-east of Darfield94.3http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/quakes/3368607g.html


Posted by davd at 17:10 NZD
Post Comment | Permalink
Sunday, 5 September 2010
Christchurch NZ Earthquake News: RadioNZ

Radio New Zealand - Te Reo Irirangi o Aotearoa

05 September, 2010

Radio New Zealand News
Christchurch Earthquake News

Christchurch quake cleanup begins
The mammoth task of assessing every building in Christchurch's earthquake-shattered central business district is underway. A state of emergency remains in place following the magnitude 7.1 earthquake on Saturday.
Earthquake fault located
Geologists have located where the magnitude 7.1 earthquake began in rural Canterbury. No-one knew the fault was there before the quake occurred at a depth of 10km at 4.35am on Saturday.
Cabinet to be briefed on Monday
Prime Minister John Key says Cabinet will be briefed on Monday on the Canterbury earthquake by Civil Defence Minister John Carter.
Aftershocks continue
Christchurch is still being shaken by aftershocks on Sunday.
Kaiapoi cleanup hindered by winds
Strong winds are making the earthquake cleanup in Kaiapoi, north of Christchurch, even more difficult.
Schools to remain closed for two days
All schools in Christchurch, Selwyn district and Kaiapoi are to be closed on Monday and Tuesday, following the major earthquake in the Canterbury region.
Power back for 95% of customers - Orion
Electricity lines company Orion says it has restored power to 95% of its customers after Saturday's earthquake. However, up to a third of residents of Christchurch were still without running water on Sunday.
Staff should not take risks on Monday say Chamber
The Canterbury Chamber of Commerce says employees should put personal safety first before travelling into work on Monday.
Railway repairs needed
KiwiRail says some train tracks running into Christchurch are damaged and it could be several days before they are repaired.
Injured man in critical condition
A man who sustained severe injuries in the earthquake is still in a critical condition in Christchurch hospital. However, several others are in a stable condition.
Supermarkets confident of supply lines
South Island supermarket operator Foodstuffs is confident it can maintain food supplies into Christchurch, following the earthquake on Saturday.
100,000 quake claims expected by EQC
The Earthquake Commission expects to receive at least 100,000 claims as a result of Saturday's earthquake.
Army on standby to assist
The Army remains on standby on Sunday, ready to assist with recovery work after the earthquake in Canterbury.
500+ buildings damaged in quake
Civil Defence estimates that more than 500 buildings in Christchurch sustained damage in Saturday's earthquake.
Prisons being inspected for damage
Structural engineers are to inspect the three prisons in Canterbury for signs of damage after Saturday's quake. Limited damage has been found so far.
Help from farmers
Federated Farmers says the rural community is extending a helping hand to those in need.
Water supplies brought into Christchurch by rail
KiwiRail shipped about 300,000 litres of drinking water into Christchurch overnight.
Port wharves structurally safe
An initial damage assessment of the Port of Lyttelton showed the wharves are structurally safe after Saturday's earthquake. Shipping will continue as usual.
Day of shocks leaves dozens homeless in Christchurch
Dozens of people were homeless in Christchurch on Saturday night and a curfew was in place downtown, after a day of shocks that began when the city was shaken awake by a major earthquake at 4.35am.
Look out for each other now, neighbours urged
Health authorities in Canterbury are calling on neighbours to look out for each other in the aftermath of Saturday's quake.
Railway line to Rangiora out till at least Monday
KiwiRail says it will be Monday at the earliest before the rail track between Christchurch and Rangiora will be open again, but the line south out of the city is now operating.
Cost of earthquake could be $2 billion, says Key
The Prime Minister says initial Treasury modelling has put the cost of the Canterbury earthquake at $2 billion, which is well within the Earthquake Commission's range.
Quake welfare centres ready for overnight influx
The welfare centres set up to support people displaced by Saturday morning's earthquake in Christchurch are preparing for an influx of homeless people on Saturday night.
A truly frightening experience, say Cantabrians
Residents have spoken of their fear as a 7.1 magnitude earthquake hit Canterbury on Saturday - many saying they had never before felt such a strong quake.
Landline phones working, some mobile disruption
Landline phones in the Christchurch area are working: Telecom says its fixed-line network has been largely unaffected and its lines maintenance company Chorus says backup power is in place.
Aftershocks may continue for weeks
A geologist is warning aftershocks may continue to rattle the Canterbury region for weeks following Saturday's major earthquake.
Quake felt throughout the country
The major quake that struck near Christchurch early on Saturday has been felt widely throughout New Zealand.
All services restored at three prisons
Electricity, water and sewerage services have been restored at Canterbury's three jails.
Both universities closed for a week
Canterbury and Lincoln university campuses and halls of residence will be closed for a week while quake damage is repaired.
Traumatised monkey dies at wildlife park
All dangerous animals are safely enclosed at Orana Wildlife Park but one monkey has died following a 7.1-magnitude earthquake in Canterbury on Saturday.
Minor damage to cathedrals
Christchurch's two historic cathedrals appear to have suffered only minor damage as a result of Saturday's earthquake.
Gas supply in working order - Contact
Contact Energy advises people to check that gas pipes are properly connected to their home and that gas bottles are standing upright.

Posted by davd at 17:23 NZD
Post Comment | Permalink
Monday, 30 August 2010
Toxic legacy: US Marines Fallujah assault

Toxic legacy of US Marines assault on Fallujah 'worse than Hiroshima'

The Independent (UK); Saturday, 24 July 2010: http://snurl.com/10wirh :
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/toxic-legacy-of-us-assault-on-fallujah-worse-than-hiroshima-2034065.html

-| The shocking rates of infant mortality and cancer
-| in the Iraqi city raise new questions about the battle
By Patrick Cockburn

Children in Fallujah who suffer from birth defects which are thought to be linked to weapons used in attacks on the city by US Marines

Getty Images

Children in Fallujah who suffer from birth defects which are thought to be linked to weapons used in attacks on the city by US Marines

Dramatic increases in infant mortality, cancer and leukaemia in the Iraqi city of Fallujah, which was bombarded by US Marines in 2004, exceed those reported by survivors of the atomic bombs that were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945, according to a new study.

Iraqi doctors in Fallujah have complained since 2005 of being overwhelmed by the number of babies with serious birth defects, ranging from a girl born with two heads to paralysis of the lower limbs. They said they were also seeing far more cancers than they did before the battle for Fallujah between US troops and insurgents.

Their claims have been supported by a survey showing a four-fold increase in all cancers and a 12-fold increase in childhood cancer in under-14s. Infant mortality in the city is more than four times higher than in neighbouring Jordan and eight times higher than in Kuwait.

Dr Chris Busby, a visiting professor at the University of Ulster and one of the authors of the survey of 4,800 individuals in Fallujah, said it is difficult to pin down the exact cause of the cancers and birth defects. He added that "to produce an effect like this, some very major mutagenic exposure must have occurred in 2004 when the attacks happened".

US Marines first besieged and bombarded Fallujah, 30 miles west of Baghdad, in April 2004 after four employees of the American security company Blackwater were killed and their bodies burned. After an eight-month stand-off, the Marines stormed the city in November using artillery and aerial bombing against rebel positions. US forces later admitted that they had employed white phosphorus as well as other munitions.

In the assault US commanders largely treated Fallujah as a free-fire zone to try to reduce casualties among their own troops. British officers were appalled by the lack of concern for civilian casualties. "During preparatory operations in the November 2004 Fallujah clearance operation, on one night over 40 155mm artillery rounds were fired into a small sector of the city," recalled Brigadier Nigel Aylwin-Foster, a British commander serving with the American forces in Baghdad.

He added that the US commander who ordered this devastating use of firepower did not consider it significant enough to mention it in his daily report to the US general in command. Dr Busby says that while he cannot identify the type of armaments used by the Marines, the extent of genetic damage suffered by inhabitants suggests the use of uranium in some form. He said: "My guess is that they used a new weapon against buildings to break through walls and kill those inside."

The survey was carried out by a team of 11 researchers in January and February this year who visited 711 houses in Fallujah. A questionnaire was filled in by householders giving details of cancers, birth outcomes and infant mortality. Hitherto the Iraqi government has been loath to respond to complaints from civilians about damage to their health during military operations.

Researchers were initially regarded with some suspicion by locals, particularly after a Baghdad television station broadcast a report saying a survey was being carried out by terrorists and anybody conducting it or answering questions would be arrested. Those organising the survey subsequently arranged to be accompanied by a person of standing in the community to allay suspicions.

The study, entitled "Cancer, Infant Mortality and Birth Sex-Ratio in Fallujah, Iraq 2005-2009", is by Dr Busby, Malak Hamdan and Entesar Ariabi, and concludes that anecdotal evidence of a sharp rise in cancer and congenital birth defects is correct. Infant mortality was found to be 80 per 1,000 births compared to 19 in Egypt, 17 in Jordan and 9.7 in Kuwait. The report says that the types of cancer are "similar to that in the Hiroshima survivors who were exposed to ionising radiation from the bomb and uranium in the fallout".

Researchers found a 38-fold increase in leukaemia, a ten-fold increase in female breast cancer and significant increases in lymphoma and brain tumours in adults. At Hiroshima survivors showed a 17-fold increase in leukaemia, but in Fallujah Dr Busby says what is striking is not only the greater prevalence of cancer but the speed with which it was affecting people.

Of particular significance was the finding that the sex ratio between newborn boys and girls had changed. In a normal population this is 1,050 boys born to 1,000 girls, but for those born from 2005 there was an 18 per cent drop in male births, so the ratio was 850 males to 1,000 females. The sex-ratio is an indicator of genetic damage that affects boys more than girls. A similar change in the sex-ratio was discovered after Hiroshima.

The US cut back on its use of firepower in Iraq from 2007 because of the anger it provoked among civilians. But at the same time there has been a decline in healthcare and sanitary conditions in Iraq since 2003. The impact of war on civilians was more severe in Fallujah than anywhere else in Iraq because the city continued to be blockaded and cut off from the rest of the country long after 2004. War damage was only slowly repaired and people from the city were frightened to go to hospitals in Baghdad because of military checkpoints on the road into the capital.

Copyright 2010 Independent Print Limited


Posted by davd at 08:53 NZD
Post Comment | Permalink

Newer | Latest | Older